Reference-dependent valuations of risk: Why willingness-to-accept exceeds willingness-to-pay
نویسندگان
چکیده
The gap between willingness-to-pay (WTP) and willingness-to-accept (WTA) benefit values typifies situations in which reference points—and direction of movement from reference points—are consequential. Why WTA-WTP discrepancies arise is not well understood. We generalize models of reference dependence to identify separate reference dependence effects for increases and decreases in environmental health risk probabilities, for increases and decreases in costs, and reference dependence effects embodying the interaction of two changes. We estimate separate reference dependence effects for the four possible cost and health risk change combinations using data from our choice-based experiment for a nationally representative sample of 4,745 households. The WTA-WTP gap is due largely to the reference dependence effects related to costs. Standard models of reference dependence are not consistent with the results, as there is an interactive effect. Estimated income effects are under a penny and thus cannot account for higher values of WTA relative to WTP.
منابع مشابه
Reference-dependent subjective expected utility
A reference-dependent generalisation of subjective expected utility theory is presented. In this theory, preferences between acts depend both on final outcomes and on reference points (which may be uncertain acts). It is characterised by a set of axioms in a Savage-style framework. A restricted form of the theory separates attitudes to end states (encoded in a ‘satisfaction function’) from atti...
متن کاملThird-generation prospect theory
We present a new theory of decision under uncertainty: third-generation prospect theory (PT). This retains the predictive power of previous versions of prospect theory, but extends that theory by allowing reference points to be uncertain while decision weights are specified in a rank-dependent way. We show that PT preferences respect a state-conditional form of stochastic dominance. The theory ...
متن کاملWillingness to accept versus willingness to pay in a discrete choice experiment.
OBJECTIVES Our main objective was to compare willingness to accept (WTA) and willingness to pay (WTP) in a discrete choice experiment on hearing aid provision. Additionally, income effect and endowment effect were explored as possible explanations for the disparity between WTA and WTP, and the impact of using a WTA and/or WTP format to elicit monetary valuations on the net benefit of the new or...
متن کاملWillingness to Accept Equals Willingness to Pay for Labor Market Estimates of the Value of Statistical Life
Willingness to Accept Equals Willingness to Pay for Labor Market Estimates of the Value of Statistical Life Our research clarifies the conceptual linkages among willingness to pay for additional safety, willingness to accept less safety, and the value of statistical life (VSL). We present econometric estimates that in the important case of workers’ decisions concerning exposure to fatal injury ...
متن کاملTheoretical Demonstration of the Willingness to Pay ( WTP ) – Willingness to Accept ( WTA ) Gap Using Multiple Reference Points
The WTP-WTA gap refers to the often observed difference between the price an individual states he is willing to sell an item (WTA), and the price he states he is willing to pay for the same item (WTP). A common explanation for the gap is the so-called endowment effect, first proposed by Thaler (1980). In the literature the endowment effect is explained very simply by appealing to the concept of...
متن کامل